Some of the fame and quality image of the journals and of the academics citing your work might rub off on you in the eyes of your evaluation committee. If you have very few citations, you may also need to focus on the quality of the journals that your work appeared. Whilst in general, this is not appropriate as some papers in top journals never get cited, on average papers in top journals get cited more than papers in lower-ranked journals.
Therefore, if your work has been published in high-impact journals, you can make the case that it is more likely that your work will be highly cited. Enago Academy, the knowledge arm of Enago, offers comprehensive and up-to-date resources on academic research and scholarly publishing to all levels of scholarly professionals: students, researchers, editors, publishers, and academic societies.
It is also a popular platform for networking, allowing researchers to learn, share, and discuss their experiences within their network and community. The team, which comprises subject matter experts, academicians, trainers, and technical project managers, are passionate about helping researchers at all levels establish a successful career, both within and outside academia. Academic Competition Fueling Citation Manipulation.
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:.
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you. Studies suggest 5 ways to increase citation counts. Top 5 PhD rules of the game. All Rights Reserved. Toggle navigation. Share on Facebook Tweet this article. Mohamed Elgendi Common words in highly cited articles. Research publishing and publications Research impact Research writing. Related articles:. Support Contact Us Corporate website. Customer Care Training. Selecting highly cited papers: Since citation rates vary by field and older papers are cited more than recent papers, the selection procedure for highly cited papers takes these factors into account.
Time period for counts: The time period for Essential Science Indicators counts is 10 years, plus partial-year counts for the current year data is updated six times a year.
Selection criteria: Citation cutoffs specific to field and year are applied to all papers in the journal set to select highly cited papers. Types of items counted: Papers are defined as regular scientific articles, review articles, proceedings papers, and research notes. Journals included: Essential Science Indicators counts are based on an Clarivate journal set see complete journal list for Essential Science Indicators categorized into 22 broad fields.
Previous left arrow key Next right arrow key Close Move. Campbell , The validity of the Roy approxiation for citation analysis, Scientometrics , 4 — Roy, N. Roy, G. Johnson Jr. Diamond , Jr. Van Heeringen, P. Dijkwel , The relationship between age, mobility and scientific productivity.
Effect of age on productivity, Scientometrics , 11 — Cole , Age and scientific performance, American Journal of Sociology , 84 — Abt , At what ages did outstanding American astronomers publish their most-cited papers?
Herrmann , How old were the authors of significant research in twentieth century astronomy at the time of their greatest achievements? Helmreich, J. Spence, W. Thorbecke , On the stability of productivity and recognition, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 7 — Nederhof, A. Van Raan , Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics, Scientometrics , 11 — Download references.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Reprints and Permissions. Plomp, R. The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy. Scientometrics 19, —
0コメント